piedmontfields wrote:Chisamba,
p.s. Cool saddle pad!
I bought it at a clinic. Then put it in storage and lost it . Then my friend who shares the.licker brought it so I played matchy matchy and made Mikhail photo me lol
piedmontfields wrote:Chisamba,
p.s. Cool saddle pad!
khall wrote:....
demi to me in this pic the up beat is on the downswing, moving from first footfall to second diagonal pair. It is as the horse engages the outside hind in the air as the horse begins the upswing in the canter stride, as the outside hind grounds (which is the collecting leg) the horse is elevated in the front but as it moves to the diagonal pair the horse loses that uphill motion in the canter stride...
demi wrote:
I don’t get it. I may never be able to do tempi changes.....
piedmontfields wrote:Tsavo, yes, your "crazy" HP method has a lot in common with my "go ahead and do travers for real down the long side" method!
khall wrote:Tsavo, piedmont did you ever try counter bending/counter flexion to get the shoulders in alignment? Riding the PRE in Spain, the gelding I liked so much initially wanted to carry his haunches R. Instructor had me ride counter flexion on the circle cantering R. I think his crookedness came more from tension. By the last ride I was not having any issues with haunches coming in.
khall wrote:Tsavo, piedmont did you ever try counter bending/counter flexion to get the shoulders in alignment? Riding the PRE in Spain, the gelding I liked so much initially wanted to carry his haunches R. Instructor had me ride counter flexion on the circle cantering R. I think his crookedness came more from tension. By the last ride I was not having any issues with haunches coming in.
Ryeissa wrote:khall wrote:Tsavo, piedmont did you ever try counter bending/counter flexion to get the shoulders in alignment? Riding the PRE in Spain, the gelding I liked so much initially wanted to carry his haunches R. Instructor had me ride counter flexion on the circle cantering R. I think his crookedness came more from tension. By the last ride I was not having any issues with haunches coming in.
what are you guys doing with your thigh and knees when they do these? Sometimes all I have to do to correct haunches out is open my outside hip as a "block" and they go back into place
For shoulder, I use more of the spiral seat bringing my thigh and knee against the shoulder. It can't always be fixed with my body, but most times I am severely contributing to this asymmetry by my issues.
Tsavo wrote: Yes counterbending at canter is fine. That's what I was doing preparing for FCs. SI not so much
piedmontfields wrote:Rye, I don't quite understand your question. In general, to correct or affirm alignment, I move or manage the shoulders--not the hind.
piedmontfields wrote:Tsavo, I think travers at canter is actually pretty hard for many horses so not something I'd jump on necessarily
Tsavo wrote:piedmontfields wrote:Tsavo, I think travers at canter is actually pretty hard for many horses so not something I'd jump on necessarily
travers in canter = canter HP
So third level. But I do agree it is hard which is why it works to straighten when off the rail.
Dresseur wrote:I Focusing on using my legs more and not just relying on my back is helping to get and keep horses in front of me .
Chisamba wrote:Dresseur wrote:I Focusing on using my legs more and not just relying on my back is helping to get and keep horses in front of me .
only for the sake of self satisfaction, i would like to point out that every time we have had this discussion, i have said more leg for the transition, and you have insisted Andrea says seat only. So i find this very interesting.
I thought perhaps it was just because i am much heavier than you but now i find Andrea does advise leg
Chisamba wrote:Rye, a lot of it is also interpretation, i mean leg has a few applications, just calf, lifted heel, and quick jab, etc, but i still found it really interesting that this time Dresseur was suggested more leg. to be honest it could be any one of the "leg aids"
the thing of course is that forward does not mean faster, and so collection does not mean slower, so more legs simple means keep the hind end engaged, most of the time.
Ryeissa wrote: my horse was throwing his haunches out, everything else about the horse was placed correctly. So it would not be correct for me to move the shoulders when it was the hind end not tracking with the rest of the horse.
Chisamba wrote:Dresseur wrote:I Focusing on using my legs more and not just relying on my back is helping to get and keep horses in front of me .
only for the sake of self satisfaction, i would like to point out that every time we have had this discussion, i have said more leg for the transition, and you have insisted Andrea says seat only. So i find this very interesting.
I thought perhaps it was just because i am much heavier than you but now i find Andrea does advise leg
piedmontfields wrote:Ryeissa wrote: my horse was throwing his haunches out, everything else about the horse was placed correctly. So it would not be correct for me to move the shoulders when it was the hind end not tracking with the rest of the horse.
So your horse is throwing itself into renvers in the canter?
We were discussing cases where a horse tended to put the haunches in (travers) in the canter--which is quite a common situation.
Ryeissa wrote:same solution- just opposite way. I often do haunches out with either inside or outside flexion (the haunches is what i am touching, not shoulder)
So I bend the horse to the outside of the circle and do haunches out with outside flexion
or I have done haunches out with inside flexion
basically I think about what results I need to fix a certain problem and decide how to position the horse. Last year was more about the shoulders, this year it's more about the haunches since I don't have as much problem with the shoulders wiggling L and Rcrooked
And we haven't even touched on the ribcage yet....that takes more of LY ideas. A horse can appear straight on the curve yet the ribs are not in line. I never knew what that felt like till last year. Its not enough to just talk about shoulders and haunches.
Tsavo wrote:Reading your posts, I think if you focus just on getting the feet to land in the correct way for SF and bend, that will take care of where the shoulders and haunches are and you don't need to micro-manage the various horse parts. That technique helped me anyway.
Tsavo wrote:I agree riding a wiggly horse is different than riding a stiff sucker. The stiff ones look more correct more of the time but you have less to work with.
With a wiggler it is absolutely imperative you establish the inside leg to outside rein as the only organizing principle that has a chance in hell of working in my opinion. I don't think it is possible to ride a horse like that without inside-outside.
What are you working on in your lessons?
Tsavo wrote:I agree riding a wiggly horse is different than riding a stiff sucker. The stiff ones look more correct more of the time but you have less to work with.
With a wiggler it is absolutely imperative you establish the inside leg to outside rein as the only organizing principle that has a chance in hell of working in my opinion. I don't think it is possible to ride a horse like that without inside-outside.
What are you working on in your lessons?
Tsavo wrote:How long do you do that before you go to inside-outside though?
Is this like BBM where you do it for a tiny while and then do balance within movement the entire rest of the training?
I agree with Chisamba that you can't have a horse hollow on the inside rein and that it is easier to do SI with only the outside rein instead of both reins. The horse has to be in both reins in SI to be correct and that being just on the outside rein is not correct. But the value in the two reins has to be different or else IW would constantly say both legs
to both reins.
Tsavo wrote:How long do you do that before you go to inside-outside though?
Is this like BBM where you do it for a tiny while and then do balance within movement the entire rest of the training?
I agree with Chisamba that you can't have a horse hollow on the inside rein and that it is easier to do SI with only the outside rein instead of both reins. The horse has to be in both reins in SI to be correct and that being just on the outside rein is not correct. But the value in the two reins has to be different or else IW would constantly say both legs to both reins.
Chisamba wrote:Tsavo wrote:How long do you do that before you go to inside-outside though?
Is this like BBM where you do it for a tiny while and then do balance within movement the entire rest of the training?
I agree with Chisamba that you can't have a horse hollow on the inside rein and that it is easier to do SI with only the outside rein instead of both reins. The horse has to be in both reins in SI to be correct and that being just on the outside rein is not correct. But the value in the two reins has to be different or else IW would constantly say both legs to both reins.
for example if i do shoulder in and i feel like the horse is hollow on the inside rein , i will simply add a 10 m circle and then go back to the shoulder in, or i will change from SI to renver and back to SI. horses simply will use the "escape from hard work" route " the rider offers, so a person too committed to inside leg to outside rein will sometimes forget the reach. I often will ask my horse to lengthen its neck right in the middle of a shoulder in, to make sure that it is still able to stretch over the topline even in the lateral work, She does not have fabulous gaits anyway, so its useful too , to make sure that she is reaching underherself with her hind legs, as opposed to posing in the the lateral work.
I do not disagree with inside leg to outside rein, i just think that it needs to be understood that the horse should still be reaching over the topline, for which the best way to check is how the horse responds to the inside rein, aka, both reins
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests